<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are traditional publishers losing sales to indies?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ilmk.wordpress.com/2012/08/06/are-traditional-publishers-losing-sales-to-indies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ilmk.wordpress.com/2012/08/06/are-traditional-publishers-losing-sales-to-indies/</link>
	<description>Fun and information about the Kindle and the world of e-books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:06:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Round up #105: I wrote that, (Lawrence) Block party &#171; I Love My Kindle</title>
		<link>http://ilmk.wordpress.com/2012/08/06/are-traditional-publishers-losing-sales-to-indies/#comment-32213</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Round up #105: I wrote that, (Lawrence) Block party &#171; I Love My Kindle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 15:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilmk.wordpress.com/?p=9244#comment-32213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I started to do that with an article this morning (Are traditional publishers losing sales to indies?) and then I realized, &#8220;Hey, I wrote that!&#8221;  I guess somebody retweeted it or something, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I started to do that with an article this morning (Are traditional publishers losing sales to indies?) and then I realized, &#8220;Hey, I wrote that!&#8221;  I guess somebody retweeted it or something, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Round up #102: Spotify, hardback sales are&#8230; &#171; I Love My Kindle</title>
		<link>http://ilmk.wordpress.com/2012/08/06/are-traditional-publishers-losing-sales-to-indies/#comment-31431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Round up #102: Spotify, hardback sales are&#8230; &#171; I Love My Kindle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 01:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilmk.wordpress.com/?p=9244#comment-31431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] I recently wrote about Simon &amp; Schuster&#8217;s sales being up, and noted that there is room in the marketplace for both tradpubs (traditional publishers) and indies (independent publishers). [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I recently wrote about Simon &amp; Schuster&#8217;s sales being up, and noted that there is room in the marketplace for both tradpubs (traditional publishers) and indies (independent publishers). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bufo Calvin</title>
		<link>http://ilmk.wordpress.com/2012/08/06/are-traditional-publishers-losing-sales-to-indies/#comment-30983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bufo Calvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 18:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilmk.wordpress.com/?p=9244#comment-30983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for writing, Janice!

Whether something is exorbitant or not is subjective, so I&quot;m not going to rule on that. :) It&#039;s more complicated than it might seem at first, in part because successful, popular books pay for unsuccessful and small market books.

Hardbacks typically have a higher retail price per unit (they cost the customer more) than an e-book...but what gets reported here is revenue. That&#039;s a bit more complex. If the hardback has a list price of $25, the publisher may be getting $12.50 for it. If the digital price is $12.99, the publisher may be getting $9.09 for it (based on the 70% Agency Model rate). 

Selling twice as many e-books of the same hardback title would make the e-book generate more revenue in the above scenario. However, it gets to be much closer when you look at e-books and paperbacks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for writing, Janice!</p>
<p>Whether something is exorbitant or not is subjective, so I&#8221;m not going to rule on that. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  It&#8217;s more complicated than it might seem at first, in part because successful, popular books pay for unsuccessful and small market books.</p>
<p>Hardbacks typically have a higher retail price per unit (they cost the customer more) than an e-book&#8230;but what gets reported here is revenue. That&#8217;s a bit more complex. If the hardback has a list price of $25, the publisher may be getting $12.50 for it. If the digital price is $12.99, the publisher may be getting $9.09 for it (based on the 70% Agency Model rate). </p>
<p>Selling twice as many e-books of the same hardback title would make the e-book generate more revenue in the above scenario. However, it gets to be much closer when you look at e-books and paperbacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice L Chase</title>
		<link>http://ilmk.wordpress.com/2012/08/06/are-traditional-publishers-losing-sales-to-indies/#comment-30933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janice L Chase]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 06:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ilmk.wordpress.com/?p=9244#comment-30933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;but p-books are still the majority of revenue&quot; How much of that revenue picture comes about because of the exhorbitant price of print books? Just wondering, because I know you have the numbers (0:
Thanks for sharing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but p-books are still the majority of revenue&#8221; How much of that revenue picture comes about because of the exhorbitant price of print books? Just wondering, because I know you have the numbers (0:<br />
Thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
