Wicked, Oz, and reimagining public domain works

Wicked, Oz, and reimagining public domain works

I have recently finished reading Wicked: Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West (Wicked Years) for the first time. I came to it as a big Oz fan, with a good knowledge of the official books in the series.

The book has been influential. When you see works created since Wicked’s release in 1995 which “reimagine” putative children’s literature for a modern, adult audience, you can often see how the spirit of this book caught on with the creative community (and with those who market entertainment). Would we have had Disney’s Once Upon a Time series without Wicked? Perhaps, but not in the same way.

I had certainly heard of Wicked: I sold it when I managed a brick and mortar bookstore. I was able to approach it without knowing much about the particulars, though.


I will reveal some fairly minor things about the book (and the original Oz books and the 1939 movie) below. I’m careful about trying not to take away the sense of discovery from those who are going to first encounter a work, and that’s why I’m giving you this warning. I don’t think I’m going to write about anything any particular plot twists, but I will mention some elements that appear in the book.

What I did anticipate was that the book was going to make the characters seem “more like real human beings”. I expected there to be sex and violence: there sometimes seems to be this idea that so-called children’s literature is limited by an ability to portray those areas of life, and that writing for adults frees the author to cover those. I don’t think L. Frank Baum wanted to put in sex scenes, and was told that was inappropriate by someone else…this isn’t an external constraint, it’s an artistic choice. There is certainly violence in the original Wizard of Oz book…the Tin Woodman alone accounts for over 100 deaths. There isn’t any explicit sex in the original series, although romantic love is an element.

That would have been okay with me. I’ve been called a prude because I don’t use obscenities in the blog, and have sometimes criticized their use by others (although I think that has not particularly been for fictional works). I alert people to possibly  objectionable elements when I do reviews, but that doesn’t make me give the book a more negative review (although I do think it can limit an audience, while perhaps expanding another).

Where did make me more uncomfortable here was the negative attitude the book presents about the world.

That always tends to get to me in books. When a book presents things as people (human or not) being generally “bad”, I find that unrealistic. I’m not a fan of cruelty in books by people who aren’t the clear “villains”, but are simply in the general populace. It just clashes with my own paradigm, in that I think people are generally “good”. For that reason, it feels…exploitative, I guess.

Gregory Maguire’s Oz is a very cruel place. Adults are cruel, children are cruel. There is overwhelming societal prejudice, against strangers, against intelligent Animals (more on that capitalization later).

Does that contrast with the original series?

Well, there are some cruel people in L. Frank Baum’s Oz. They are, however, in a tiny minority.

That’s perhaps part of why Oz has been part of our culture for well over a hundred years. People who read Oz would like to go there…despite the Wicked Witches, the Nome King, the Wheelers, the Princess who wants to take your head, and the deadly Kalidahs. There is slavery (it’s quite common), and suicide. Still, most people in Oz are good, and Ozma (the main ruler of Oz after the Wizard) has an open heart.

That’s nothing like Maguire’s Oz. Maguire carefully brings in names and elements from the original series, but they are seen through the opposite of rose-colored glasses.

Mentioning color brings up a key point.

While the book is supposedly based on the public domain Oz books, and gathers characters from books beyond the first (Tik-Tok, for example, appears in a different form…the clockwork robot first appeared in the fifth book of the series), it clearly owes a great deal to the non-public domain 1939 movie, The Wizard of Oz.

Much of what happens in the book stems from the Wicked Witch of the West being green. Naturally, that’s seen as a bad omen (I don’t think there are any good omens in Wicked). As an infant and forward, Elphaba (Maguire creates new names for characters), is seen as a symbol of evil because of skin color, and that naturally impacts the future Wicked Witch’s emotional development.

The Wicked Witch of the West is not green in the L. Frank Baum books. That was apparently introduced in the 1939 movie, partially to show off the color in the movie.

Also, the Witch flying on a broomstick is important in Maguire’s Oz, and does not happen in Baum’s (although other witches do fly on broomsticks much later in the series).

After someone sings a song in Wicked, there is a mention of rainbows…a not so subtle connection to Somewhere Over the Rainbow.

It’s absolutely fair to say that the 1939 movie was also different from the original books. It was not a success when first released…there were many Oz fans who didn’t like the casting of Bert Lahr, a known comedian, as the Cowardly Lion, for one thing.

However, it is different in different ways from Maguire’s Oz. It differs more in specifics than in tone.

Did I like Wicked?

Yes…I thought the writing was quite good. It was harsh, it was deliberately shocking in places, it was sometimes jarring (cigarettes, adjustable loans, and trains in Oz? For one thing, where were they growing the tobacco?)…but I really felt for the characters. I was anxious to see what happened next.

For me, it would have been a much better book if it didn’t have the Oz veneer over it…but can I honestly say I would ever have read it if it had just been a sort of Dickensian tale, without the magic and familiar characters? Probably not.

I will go on to other books in the Maguire series.

One last note about the book itself. I mentioned this capitalization thing with Animals. That was something that bothered be every time it happened: intelligent animals in Maguire’s Oz are pronounced in some way with a capital letter. That’s to distinguish a Cow (which speaks and thinks like a human) from a cow (which doesn’t). I didn’t get that: how do you pronounce it differently? I listened to part of the book with text-to-speech, and of course, Ivona didn’t pronounce it any differently. I didn’t have trouble telling what was meant by the context, though…it just seemed like a contrivance. As a vegetarian, I wasn’t happy with the treatment of the animals or Animals in the book, but people weren’t particularly more cruel to them than they were to other more human types that they encountered.

This all got me thinking about when people reimagine public domain works. That can produce some great things. For example, West Side Story and Forbidden Planet are both based (somewhat loosely) on Shakespeare plays (Romeo and Juliet and The Tempest, respectively).

That can lead to some great new insights and art. Philip José Farmer’s A Barnstormer In Oz, which preceded Wicked by some thirteen years, similarly explores Oz with a different sensibility…and yes, more realistic violence and sex than the original books.

I’m not opposed, under the current legal structure, to new adventures with public domain characters…I just recommended authors do just that in Three characters walk into a plot….

I think Wicked has considerable value as a work of art, even if I don’t personally like its sensibility.

I don’t think a derivative work damages the original…even though many people may first become familiar with something through an adaptation or derivation (I would guess the vast majority of people in the world know MGM’s Oz much better than Baum’s).

I’m curious what you think, though. Do you feel like classic characters and books need to be “respected” by not being portrayed in ways other than the original? Is it okay for later authors to change their inner motivations? What do you think when a book labeled a children’s book is “updated” with sex and explicit violence? If that’s clear to the audience, is it still some sort of “violation” of the characters?

Feel free to let me and my readers know what you think by commenting on this post.

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the I Love My Kindle blog.

9 Responses to “Wicked, Oz, and reimagining public domain works”

  1. Zebras Says:

    I love many works like this that have been derived from public domain works. However, I read Wicked when it first was published and really hated it. Its been too long for me to remember why I hated it, though. But I have even avoided seeing the musical because I know I hated the book that much. Too bad the Little House books are not in public domain. We could have lots of fun writing Little Vampire on the Prairie. Or Litle House on Mars.

    • Bufo Calvin Says:

      Thanks for writing, Zebras!

      Well, perhaps whoever owns the rights for Little House will put it in Kindle Worlds…then we could see the kinds of works you suggest (if their guidelines didn’t prohibit them).

  2. Lady Galaxy Says:

    I purchased the books in the Wicked series recently when they were “on sale” in the Kindle store, but I haven’t read them. I wanted to go back and reread the original Oz first, and in doing so, I’m realizing that the version I read as a kid must have been abridged! I think that was the book that made me realize how different the movie version and the book version could be.

    Blame it on Rocky and Bullwinkle, but I’ve always loved the “fractured fairy tale” concept. When I was teaching high school level creative writing, one of my assignments was for students to pick out a favorite fairy tale and retell it from a modern point of view. When I taught elementary school reading, I had several books of fairy tales that had been rewritten with a modern twist. Unfortunately, when I retired, I had to leave them behind because they had been purchased with school funds, so I can’t provide titles or authors.

    In her book of children’s poetry called “If I Were in Charge of the World and other worries,” Judith Viorst wrote several poems that give a different twist on Cinderella, The Frog Prince, The Little Mermaid and Rapunzel. Some are funny and others are poignant. It doesn’t seem to be available on Kindle, but the paperback and hardcover versions are available from Amazon.

    I am sure there are some very disrespectful fractured fairy tales out there, but the ones I like are the ones intended for children. I especially like the ones where the damsel in distress saves herself through her own wits without intervention from a handsome prince! One of the funniest ones involved Cinderella eventually owning a shoe factory making “kicks.”

    I know your question was more about public domain characters, but what frustrates me sometimes is what happens to characters when they go from book to TV series. The Temperance Brennan on “Bones” is NOTHING like the character in the books. Since I knew her from the books, I really disliked the TV character at first. I finally just had to accept that the TV character was in a different quantum universe than the one in the books in order to enjoy both. Now I notice from reviews of the newer books in the series that people are complaining because the character in the book is nothing like the one in the TV series.

    • Bufo Calvin Says:

      Thanks for writing, Lady!

      Yes, your last point about “which one is the real one” is always interesting to me. There are kids for whom Star Wars: The Clone Wars (a cartoon) is the “real Star Wars”. There was the joke in the 1970s with the two teenagers, and one says to the other, “Did you know Paul McCartney was in a band before Wings?” 😉

      Putting “feminist fairy tales” into the USA Kindle store gives me 26 results…some of them won’t fall into the category you mentioned, but some do.

      I also liked Fractured Fairy Tales! For quite some time, I didn’t know that The Princess and the Goblin(s) existed outside of FFT…

      If you are willing to pay for it by watching ads, you can see it here:


  3. Lady Galaxy Says:

    My first experience with being on the reverse side of the generation gap was when I put one of my trivia “extra credit” questions on a test asking the students if they could identify John, Paul, George and Ringo. One of my students thought those might be the faces on Mt. Rushmore.

    • Bufo Calvin Says:

      Thanks for writing, Lady!

      I think your student’s idea was gear! Um…oh, would have been a term of approval in the 1960s…sort of like “sick” now. 😉

      I think I was most surprised when, on The Amazing Race, the teams all seemed to struggle with the quote (identified as a President) of “Tear down this wall”. That just seemed recent enough, and significant enough, that I would have generally expected the contestants to know it…even though they don’t exactly pass a Jeopardy screening to be on that show.

  4. KDD: 42 titles, from Tobacco Road to The Cider House Rules | I Love My Kindle Says:

    […] Baum Oz books (although key elements are from the 1939 Judy Garland movie…see my review at Wicked, Oz, and reimagining public domain works), and in turn, the inspiration for the novel, this has been a popular book…although the world […]

  5. Round up #308: | I Love My Kindle Says:

    […] Regular readers know I’m a big fan of the Oz books, and have written some about Oz (I have a book I’d like to write which is tied to Oz…it’s not in the front of the list, though). You can read my thoughts about Wicked (on which the popular ((so to speak)) musical was based) here: Wicked, Oz, and reimagining public domain works. […]

  6. Monthly Kindle Deals up to 80% off: May 2017 | I Love My Kindle Says:

    […] Wicked: Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West (Wicked Years Book 1) by Gregory Maguire (read my review here: https://ilmk.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/wicked-oz-and-reimagining-public-domain-works/ […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: