Round up #274: Americans’ fear, hardware sales
The ILMK Round ups are short pieces which may or may not be expanded later.
There are a lot of sales lately on hardware from Amazon.
This the model I use every day…and I like it well enough that I’m not looking to upgrade to this year’s models (although I’m hoping to get to review them for you).
In fact, I’m watching the World Series right now on mine, using the free
app. It looks great, by the way!
I saw some interesting reviews of the app…some may have been written for an earlier version, since it works fine for my Fire HDX. I also saw someone saying that it would kill cable…nope. I had to sign into our cable provider before it would let me watch.
I can also mirror it to my TV, using my Fire TV.
Right now, there is a sale on a bundle of the Fire HDX and the Fire TV:
If you think of the FHDX as $179, that makes the Fire TV $80…$20 off. That’s $40 off both!
I like my Fire TV a lot, too…this might be a case of you keeping both (they go together very well, thanks to the mirroring), or giving one or both as gifts at the holidays.
That deal is so good they are limiting it to one to a customer…while it lasts.
which isn’t my favorite Amazon device at this point…but it does work as my phone, it’s available for as little as…free (with a plan).
Meanwhile, you can get a refurb (refurbished) Kindle Fire HDX 8.9″ with 4G…for as little as $159!
To use the 4G (which is like a cellphone connection…it’s another way to connect to the internet, in addition to the wi-fi it can also do), you’ll need to pay for a dataplan…but$159 for an 8.9″ device is a really good deal.
This is the model that has an HDMI out, so you can show what’s on your tablet on your TV using a cable (if your TV has an HDMI in…most modern TVs will). That’s a plus, in just needing a cable. However, some apps will detect the HDMI cable and refuse to play…the Xfinity app used to do that for me.
The refurbs have the same warranty as new ones.
New 10.1″ NOOK tablet
You think 8.9″ is big?
Barnes & Noble and Samsung have just announced a 10.1″ tablet:
It’s $299.99 (with a $50 rebate), and comes with $200 of NOOK content (they pick, not surprisingly).
Yep, they are still in the game…
A charter for readers’ rights
I have to say, this
strikes me as truly bizarre.
Certainly, it’s reasonable to write an article setting out what you think should be the rights of readers…I was expecting something to balance what the authors have recently been saying, and what the publishers and retailers say.
This one just has some very odd points.
Before I do that, let me say…the title actually says “reader’s rights”, and maybe that’s appropriate. Maybe it isn’t supposed to be plural, but just this writer’s personal pet peeves. ;)
Second, the photo that they have of a Kindle is the original, 2007 model. Perhaps Proctor would be a bit less anti-Kindle if the current models were compared to paper?
I’ll just mention the first complaint: movie tie-in editions. Yep, Proctor doesn’t like it that you can buy a copy of a book with pictures of the actors from the movie on the cover.
I think, perhaps, Jason Proctor doesn’t realize how much movies affect sales of books, and how much they can turn movie watchers into readers. This strikes me as a kind of literati snobbery…if you aren’t a “pure reader”, don’t be a reader at all.
I’d rather encourage everybody to read…and if a movie is a gateway to reading, great! I suspect it wouldn’t have been too hard to find an edition of the book without the movie cover, if you wanted to do that.
You can add your own comments as they build this list at
I might do that, but I’d want to do it in a positive way. Of course, one of mine might be:
1. The right to read any edition of any book, even one with a movie tie-in cover, without having anyone look down on me and try to discourage me from reading ;)
British perspective on USA and book banning
I don’t want to suggest that there is only one British perspective on…well, anything. :) Just like there wouldn’t be only one American perspective on anything.
However, it does say something when a person from outside your group is stating that they are looking at you in that way…as an outsider.
The article looks at books being challenged in America (challenged in libraries, school curricula, that sort of thing) for being “anti-capitalist”.
I’m not sure that it’s a widespread problem, but it happens…remember that this isn’t censorship by the government, but individuals and groups requesting that books be withheld from readers.
I think the article reasonably makes its point: I believe that some people don’t want people reading books which go against “American values”.
I think that attitude is a non-productive one. As I’ve said many times on the blog before, I want people to be exposed to ideas which are the opposite of mine. I don’t want those ideas to slink around freely in the shadows: I want to shine the full light of day on them, and let people see them for what they are.
In the past, industry groups have imposed these sorts of rules on themselves. The old Comics Code Authority included a provision that “…Policemen, judges, government officials, and respected institutions shall never be presented in such a way as to create disrespect for established authority.”
In the USA, we’ve never applied a standard like that to books. Certainly, Huck Finn wouldn’t have passed a restriction like that, just to name one.
According to this article, this is being applied to non-fiction in addition to fiction.
People often ask on the Amazon Kindle forums how they can tell which books are “R rated”, or something like that.
The answer is simple: none of them.
The movie industry has its own rating system.
The music industry has its own rating system.
The videogame industry has its own rating system.
The book publishing industry does not…and I don’t think it is likely to establish one.
However, just because the publishers aren’t getting together to label books, that doesn’t mean that private groups aren’t doing it.
Those groups may also go after schools and libraries.
I’m not quite sure if the article is suggesting that this is an American flaw…that it is something which wouldn’t happen in the UK.
We have always had different standards. American movies have tended to be more lenient with violence and stricter with sexual content than European movies (and TV).
The Boris Karloff Frankenstein was given an “H certificate” in England…rating it too horrific for those under 16 years of age (this wasn’t universally ((no pun intended)) enforced).
I must say I found it an interesting perspective, and I think you may as well.
What do you think? Are Americans (not the government) more likely to try to block counter-culture material than Britons? The article really focuses on how the block can be against portraying poverty…do we only want our children to read through rose-colored glasses? Does a 10.1 inch tablet interest you…and will the NOOK brand still be around a year from now? Should Amazon bring out a tablet that large? What about an EBR (E-Book Reader) that size? What would you put on a list of “readers’ rights”? Feel free to tell me and my readers what you think by commenting on this post.
Join hundreds of readers and try the free ILMK magazine at Flipboard!
* I am linking to the same thing at the regular Amazon site, and at AmazonSmile. When you shop at AmazonSmile, half a percent of your purchase price on eligible items goes to a non-profit you choose. It will feel just like shopping at Amazon: you’ll be using your same account. The one thing for you that is different is that you pick a non-profit the first time you go (which you can change whenever you want)…and the good feeling you’ll get. Shop ’til you help!
This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the I Love My Kindle blog. To support this or other blogs/organizations, buy Amazon Gift Cards from a link on the site, then use those to buy your items. There will be no cost to you, and a benefit to them.